Talk:Association of Software Professionals

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Notability[edit]

Here are some references as to the ASP's notability. They don't really go in the article and I'm not sure where else to put them - hopefully this is right.

ASSOCIATION OF SHAREWARE PROFESSIONALS: ASP members wa walk away with top honors. on M2 Presswire, , August 6, 1999[1].
Association of Shareware Professionals (ASP) Announces New Author Standards. on Businesswire, August 7, 1995[2].
SHAREWARE: A MATTER OF TRUST PAYMENT? OPTIONAL. COPYING? NO PROBLEM. THAT MAKES IT WORK. Page C01, The Philadelphia Inquirer, June 21, 1993[3].
PERSONAL TECHNOLOGY TECH REPORT ON TECHNOLOGY : Single CD-ROM offers giant haul of shareware, The Atlanta Journal and the Atlanta Constitution[4].
TAKING SOFTWARE FOR A TEST DRIVE SIDEBAR: TO GET THERE FROM HERE The Boston Globe, October 27, 1995[5].
PERIPHERALS;A Bountiful Grab Bag of Programs New York Times, April 30, 1996. [6]
SOFTWARE; They Give It Away, Get Plenty Back New York Times June 13, 2001[7].

These were all sourced through Google News, which I believe makes them reputable sources for Wikipedia purposes. Unfortunately many of them are pay-per-view but the article summary on Google News demonstrates that they are relevant. They all refer to the ASP in non-trivial ways. --Irrevenant [ talk ] 08:54, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The ASP currently has more than 800 members worldwide, and each of these members are either professional software companies or services used by software developers. Those members will have contributed to most of the applications currently running on your computer.Wallumbase (talk) 08:45, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Association of Software Professionals. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120404085154/http://www.isvcon.org:80/contact.php to http://www.isvcon.org/contact.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:30, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]