From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Medicine (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

History section[edit]

I have added a history section, to where I have moved "the origin of the term". A problem I can see is that this article has sections only on audiology in GB and India, while now the history refers only to the USA! Maybe an audiologist historian can fix that, so that one has an overview of the development in the world. This is probably closely related to technological advances, as much as to a caring ethos and clinical skills. The profession being of recent origin, my guess is that the documentation should be available somewhere. A US citizen may add something about the science in that country. --Seejyb 11:30, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

UK service provision[edit]

The Commons Health Select Committee has reviewed service provision and its problems in the UK, with a report in May this year: here. Perhaps worth mentioning. JFW | T@lk 20:47, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed Information[edit]

The section regarding training in the United States lists 52 states. Obviously, there's 50 states. If this refers to two American Territories, it should specify which territories. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 00:18, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

In the main section about audiology and audiologists - there were two paragraphs about Hearing Aid dispensers and what they do. This was removed as this information should be on the page regarding hearing aid dispensing. Additionally, there were statements that were inaccurate in the removed paragraph about licensure and certification. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 15:13, 8 October 2009 (UTC)