Jump to content

Talk:Aztec use of entheogens/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Yucca schidigera

I removed the section on this plant, since it clearly indicated that yucca was used medicinally and for clothing, and made a point to say it was NOT an entheogen. This article is not titled, "Aztec use of plants," and use of plants for medicinal purposes such as treating a headache does not make those plants entheogens. Entheogen means "God inside us" and refers quite explicitly to the use of psychoactive plants for spiritual/religious purposes. It does not include the entire history of human use of plants for any purpose. 99.129.135.10 (talk) 14:30, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Untitled

Entheogenic redirected to a band.. so i remove the link.

Article title

Is there any particular reason why the article's title is capitalised? Unless "Entheogenic Complex" rates as a formally-defined compound noun (and a cursory search reveals only one other instance in which the two words are combined, so I guess it isn't), then it should probably be at Aztec entheogenic complex. Also, the use of these substances for shamanistic purposes was practised by most, if not all pre-Columbian Mesoamerican societies, including non-Aztec Nahua speakers and non-Nahua speakers alike- which would be good to note, if not expand upon, here.--cjllw | TALK 03:54, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

I've moved the page. I think the title is not very good anyway, regardless of capitalization. Piet 13:18, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
Would Aztec entheogens be better? Piet 13:21, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

I think that would be a better title, or even something like entheogen use in Aztec society. I dunno, sure that there's a better name for it out there somewhere...--cjllw | TALK 14:45, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Sinicuichi

Sinicuichi is mentioned as one of the entheogens, but its page mentions nothing about psychoactive properties of the plant. Perhaps it needs an update or there should be a caveat here

  • None of the listed alkaloids are known as hallucinogens so this section is quite suspect. The whole article has a number of very dubious claims with no documentation. I've noted a couple. There is a lot of accurate information but, as pointed out elsewhere, the lack of in-text citations diminishes the value. The references ae also not the best available on this topic.Itzcoatl (talk) 06:50, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Expansion

How about turning this article into Mesoamerican use of entheogens, or just Mesoamerican entheogens? I doubt most of these were restricted to the Mexica or to Nahuatl-speakers. --Ptcamn (talk) 20:57, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

not a bad idea, I'm a little reluctant only because I don't know if theres any good sources for any other peoples outside of the Aztecs?·Maunus· ·ƛ· 21:08, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for renaming the page, much clearer now.
Direct evidence may be sketchy, but the use of psychotropic substances among the (pre-Columbian) Maya has been written about before. I think that a pan-Mesoamerican article could readily be put together, without resorting to neoshamanistic sources. But unless anyone's got the time or is planning to start accumulating these refs, the article can probably get by under its present scope. --cjllw ʘ TALK 01:53, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

The Erowid reference

This is not a scientific or scholarly reference. ("Sometimes my balls even pulsate on thinking an erotic thought about my potential prospect: that shit has had me do all sorts of crazy." Just one quotation.) Unless a persuasive case is made for its inclusion in this article, I'm going to remove it. Laodah 00:01, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aztec use of entheogens. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:26, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aztec use of entheogens. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:12, 16 January 2018 (UTC)