Talk:BC-41
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the BC-41 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Start a discussion about improving the BC-41 page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "BC-41" page.
Categories:
- Stub-Class military history articles
- Stub-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
- Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
- Stub-Class weaponry articles
- Weaponry task force articles
- Stub-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- Stub-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- Stub-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles
- Stub-Class United Kingdom articles
- Low-importance United Kingdom articles
- United Kingdom articles needing attention
- WikiProject United Kingdom articles
- Wikipedia articles that use British English