Talk:Bangladesh International School, Dammam/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: KJP1 (talk · contribs) 20:13, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Quick fail criteria assessment

1. The article is a long way from meeting any one of the GA criteria.

   • 

2. The article contains copyright violations.

   • 

3. There are cleanup banners that are obviously still valid, including cleanup, wikify, NPOV, unreferenced or large numbers of fact, clarifyme, or similar tags.

   • 

4. The article is unstable.

   • 

The article fails Criterion 2 as, with the exception of the final paragraph and the Board of Directors section which is sourced to itself, it is completely unsourced. It also reads like a prospectus, rather than an objective article. KJP1 (talk) 20:13, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Main review

1. It is well written.

a (prose):

b (MoS):

2. It is verifiable with Wikipedia:No original research.

a (references)

b (citations to reliable sources)

c (OR)

d (No evidence of plagiarism or copyright violations)

3. It is broad in its scope.

a (major aspects)

b (focused)

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

5. It is stable.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):

b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

Pass/Fail: