Jump to content

Talk:Bart's Dog Gets an "F"/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    None provided.
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    None Provided.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:


I had to make two very minor fixes, but all in all, a great article. If you feel this review was in err—take it to GA Review. ceranthor 14:34, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Ceranthor! :) TheLeftorium 14:53, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]