Talk:Batman: The Dark Knight (video game)/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Argento Surfer (talk · contribs) 18:31, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
All of my comments are open for discussion. Once complete, I'll claim this review for points in the 2018 wikicup. Argento Surfer (talk) 18:31, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- These are my copyedits. Feel free to revert, revise, or discuss any of them.
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- no concern
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- no concern
- B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
- no concern
- C. It contains no original research:
- no concern
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- "The direction ... changed when Pandemic learned that the game had to be based on the film" - Is there more detail available on this? It seems to contradict earlier statements. What did Pandemic think they were making, a generic Batman game? A "loosely inspired" one? If nothing more is available, I recommend removing this sentence. It isn't vital to the paragraph, and as-is it's more teasing than informative.
- I've removed it. The Unseen64 video says it happened after they got concept art of the Joker but doesn't say if that's what made it change. JOEBRO64 11:26, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- Works for me. Argento Surfer (talk) 17:20, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- I've removed it. The Unseen64 video says it happened after they got concept art of the Joker but doesn't say if that's what made it change. JOEBRO64 11:26, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- "The direction ... changed when Pandemic learned that the game had to be based on the film" - Is there more detail available on this? It seems to contradict earlier statements. What did Pandemic think they were making, a generic Batman game? A "loosely inspired" one? If nothing more is available, I recommend removing this sentence. It isn't vital to the paragraph, and as-is it's more teasing than informative.
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- no concern
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- no concern
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- no concern
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- n/a
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- n/a
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- One request for additional information under 3A. Otherwise everything looks great. Argento Surfer (talk) 20:09, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- Responded above. Thanks for reviewing. JOEBRO64 11:26, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Argento Surfer: whoops, forgot to ping. JOEBRO64 11:33, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- Looks good to me. Happy to promote this one. Argento Surfer (talk) 17:20, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- One request for additional information under 3A. Otherwise everything looks great. Argento Surfer (talk) 20:09, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail:
