Talk:Baykar

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Baykar article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Cold War / Post-Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)
	Post-Cold War task force

Criticism and controversies

@Armatura, Dijkstra, and 5.25.166.188: I was looking at 5.25.166.188's edits, and, quite frankly, I am confused why you removed that section. I didn't want to start an edit war so I moved the Criticism and controversies section to Talk:Baykar/Criticism and controversies.

I just want to say that every company, defense company or not, will have criticism and controversy. Although 5.25.166.188 does have a point here, the article probably needs to be split into Özdemir Bayraktar. This is my first time trying to find a community consensus, if I did something wrong please tell me! Thanks. Sungodtemple a tcg fan!!1 !11 !! (talk)

Hello Sungodtemple, I reverted it. The section can be found on similar articles aswell. IP user doesn't seem like an experienced editor. --Dijkstra (talk) 18:42, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sungodtemple, thanks for the question, the section describes what it says - controversies and criticism of the company. It doesn't make sense to remove the bulk of the text with an "I don't like it" kind of comment, or with original research into the how Armenia underestimated Azerbaijan - completely unrelated comment. Also, defence and attack are different things (Bayraktar drones were used in attack against Armenia), and there is an embargo on selling arms to Azerbaijan and Armenia, which Baykar (along with Israeli and Russian companies) violated. The reaction from international manufacturers is quite explicit - they didn't want to collaborate with Baykar after learning these realities. --Armatura (talk) 21:28, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help! Sungodtemple a tcg fan!!1 !11 !! (talk) 12:08, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

FbG VprUEAA1m6M.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:52, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Foundation date is wrong

I think the foundadion date of Bayraktar wrong because in original website, it stated as 1986 [1]. AlfredMango (talk) 04:54, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]