Talk:Beauty and the Beast (franchise)

Disney Low‑importance

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Media franchises Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media franchises, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to media franchises on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Media franchisesWikipedia:WikiProject Media franchisesTemplate:WikiProject Media franchisesmedia franchise articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wreck-It Ralph is not a part of this franchise[edit]

~~Some~~One characters will appear in the new Wreck-It Ralph movie. This is more of a crossover, not an extension to this franchise. There is nothing else in common. Wreck-It Ralph is its own franchise. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:41, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Defining more detail. Animated, Live-action, Television, Crossover Nurseline247 (talk) 12:31, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Nurseline247: They have their normal meanings. Justify why you wish to add cameo and minor appearances of one character in other shows and franchises to an article about this franchise. The other shows have nothing do do with this story, none of the principal actors and crew, except for one character, show up in the other stories. It is not marketed as part of this franchise. At most that is trivia that deserves no more than a small mention, if even that. It definitely does not justify adding a bunch of extra columns to a cast table that is already fairly busy that just details one person, one of which is a film that is part of some other franchise, that is still in development and not even real yet. Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:56, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Beauty and the Beast (franchise). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091231074633/http://gamefaqs.com/console/nes/data/587127.html to http://www.gamefaqs.com/console/nes/data/587127.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090930181734/http://www.gamefaqs.com/console/snes/data/588215.html to http://www.gamefaqs.com/console/snes/data/588215.html
Added {{dead link}} tag to https://m.cinemascore.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:37, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]