Talk:Benjamin scale

This article was nominated for deletion on 5 September 2012. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

Sexology and sexuality Mid‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page has a blatent copyright violation

At the time when Dr. Benjamin practised, no transsexual could qualify as eligible for transition if he/she wasn't completely homosexual (relative to his/her birth sex), thus, heterosexual after transition. It was just because at the time it was believed that "obviously a real, normal female should be completely heterosexual," and a lesbian female was perceived as somewhat deviant, wrong or abnormal. So it seemed to doctors (including Benjamin himself) to be absurd to help transition a MtF who was attracted to women. As transsexuals discovered this bias, they started to lie in order to get hormones and surgery. Today most gender clinics presume sexual orientation and gender identity are distinct.

The scale was referring only to MtF transsexuals (transwomen), and male transvestites, since Dr. Benjamin had relatively little experience with FtM transsexuals (transmen).

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.genderpsychology.org/transsexual/benjamin_gd.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 16:17, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Banned editor BenjiBoi

I'm cleaning up after the mess made by BenjiBoi. It looks like one of his socks made this revert. I was going to undo this, but since I noticed that this article has editors involved in ongoing disputes I'm going to ask here before touching this one. little green rosetta(talk)
central scrutinizer 18:30, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I too am uncomfortable doing or saying much until after the relevant ArbCom case is completed, but I think my opinion is pretty clear already: All the content is much more appropriate to transsexuality typology pages, IMO, so would be better as a redirect to that.— James Cantor (talk) 21:42, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]