Talk:Beta Aquarii

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Astronomy (Rated C-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon Beta Aquarii is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Absolute magnitude[edit]

The numbers given about this star do not add up. If it was 600ly away it would not be visible with a luminsity of 1.1 x the Sun. Has someone left out a minus sign in the absolute magnitude?

The information at http://stars.astro.illinois.edu/sow/sadalsuud.html makes more sense. It places the luminosity at 2,200 times that of our sun, giving a radius of 50X and a Solar Mass of 6X. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.203.198.172 (talk) 14:37, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

The MV was unsourced and probably OR, so I removed it. For MV I get: 2.87 + 5(1 + log10 0.00607) = –3.21. Soubiran et al (2008) gives an MBol of –3.66. Regards, RJH (talk) 20:18, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Table ballooned[edit]

The triple star table is a huge mess & has been since the 'nested table' revision of 17 May - or is it just me? Rothorpe (talk) 17:41, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

That section has been cleaned up, removing the unsubstantiated statements about it being a triple star. Thanks. Regards, RJH (talk) 20:18, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Beta Aquarii. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Question? Archived sources still need to be checked

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:38, 31 October 2016 (UTC)