GA Review [ edit ]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Bicknell-Armington Lightning Splitter House/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jaguar ( talk · contribs) 22:17, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
I feel horrible for the backlog here 22:17, 30 October 2015 (UTC) JAG UAR
: No links found. Disambiguations
: No linkrot found in this article. Linkrot
Checking against the GA criteria [ edit ]
(see GA review here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
reasonably well written.
(prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (: MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists)
I would recommend splitting the lead into two paragraphs to make the lead more balanced, per
WP:LEAD Link "gable" for accessibility
I would also recommend expanding the lead slightly in order to summarise, but I'll turn a blind eye as I recognise information could be scarce in this subject matter
"The house's "Lightning Splitter" design harkens to the superstitious belief that the sharp angled gable would deflect bolts of lightning" - is this claim in the source given?
"The house is located on the southwest corner of Pawtucket Avenue and Willett Avenue (Rhode Island Route 103)" - personally I wouldn't use brackets for the road
"were not listed in the National Register of Historic Places nomination serve to further enhance its importance" - 'serve'?
factually accurate and .
(: reference section) b (citations to : reliable sources) c (: OR) It is
broad in its coverage.
(: major aspects) b (: focused) It follows the
neutral point of view policy
Fair representation without bias: It is
No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by
and other media, where possible and appropriate.
(images are tagged and non-free content have : fair use rationales) b (: appropriate use with suitable captions)
Nice house! This article meets the GA criteria, although I think the lead is a tad short. Promoting
22:44, 30 October 2015 (UTC) JAG UAR