Talk:Big Mac Index/Archives/2016
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Big Mac Index. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
UBS can you please stop trying to move to the top of the article
UBS is trying to put an ad for something of theirs in the first section of the article. This is very confusing. Hundreds of banks, etc, happen to use "variations on" the BMI, and this is of little interest. For some reason Commonwealth and UBS get a free ad on this page. Be sure this is kept in the "variations" section, if at all. If you are from UBS and you try to - yet again - move your advert for UBS up to the lead section, don't do that. 24.42.191.195 (talk) 13:17, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Six most expensive list isn't accurate
In France in mid 2013 Big Mac de-facto costs between 6 and 7 Euros, which is ~$8, however France isn't in the list. I think the ref#20 ("The Big Mac index") is simply missing France. Yurivict (talk) 08:38, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
The six cheapest list is also bullshit191.84.227.109 (talk) 13:20, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Big Mac Index. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.smh.com.au/news/technology/ipod-index-trumps-the-bigmac-one/2007/01/18/1169095897045.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090417222149/http://www.economist.com:80/finance/displaystory.cfm?story_id=E1_TVJRVJ to http://www.economist.com/finance/displaystory.cfm?story_id=E1_TVJRVJ
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:38, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
The Economist url was a different article than the one cited, but I fixed it. Clarinetguy097 (talk) 02:15, 3 November 2016 (UTC)