Talk:Birmingham to Worcester via Bromsgrove line

Trains: in UK Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

Worcestershire Mid‑importance

	Worcestershire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Worcestershire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Worcestershire-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WorcestershireWikipedia:WikiProject WorcestershireTemplate:WikiProject WorcestershireWorcestershire articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Identity of Line

Just wandering what WP policy is on this kind of rail line, which is nearly completely covered in Cross Country Route and Cross-City Line (Birmingham - Stoke Works junction (South Bromsgrove)), Birmingham to Worcester via Kidderminster Line (Droitwich - Worcester) and Cotswold Line (Worcester & onwards)? The only unique section of this line is the mainly single-track line between Droitwich to Stoke Works jnc. I'd assume that the reason this has its own article, is because of the service pattern that follows this route and on to Hereford, although I am not familiar with the history of this line. Perhaps a better way of improving this area of UK rail infrastructure would be to create "Droitwich-Bromsgrove line" and improve the aforementioned articles? Davemnt (talk) 21:43, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]