Talk:Bitcoin faucet
Appearance
The contents of the Bitcoin faucet page were merged into History of bitcoin on September 2, 2020 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
This article was nominated for deletion on 31 July 2020. The result of the discussion was merge. |
This page was proposed for deletion by Ysangkok (talk · contribs) on 10 July 2020. |
'Promotional' content in article
[edit]I've removed some promotional material in this page, which was partially reverted. I think the following content doesn't belong in this article, as per WP policies WP:UNDUE and WP:NOTPROMOTION:
- 'There are also faucets that dispense Dogecoins or other alternative cryptocurrencies.' - There is nothing noteworthy about Dogecoin in particular. A Google News search does not show coverage of any Dogecoin faucets by reliable sources. I don't see any reason for mentioning a specific cryptocurrency in the lead, when the altcoin faucets are already mentioned in general.
- and they add up to make a larger payment that is sent to your 'on blockchain.info or Microwallet periodically' - This sentence is factually incorrect (bitcoins are not sent to blockchain.info, blockchain.info is one wallet provider. I think the writer meant blockchain), but I don't see any reason for mentioning those two wallet services specifically. One arguably reliable source, [1] gives trivial mention to 3 wallet providers - "Microwallet.org, Coinbox.me and BitChest.me", so why is Microwallet given undue weight by being mentioned specifically when it doesn't have any more coverage? I propose replacing this with 'sent to a wallet', and perhaps describing offchain wallet accumulators in general.
- 'List of bitcoin faucets' external link: WP:LINKSTOAVOID, "Lists of links to manufacturers, suppliers or customers.' I don't think this link adds any encyclopedic value to the page. ☃ Unicodesnowman (talk) 02:59, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- I have removed some more link spam disguised as references, and started a rewrite of the "Purpose" section. But the article needs more work, it still reads like a "how to start a bitcoin faucet and get rich" manual instead of an encyclopedic descriptive article. GermanJoe (talk) 20:03, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Image text
[edit]"Named after real faucets, bitcoin faucets dispense cryptocurrencies instead of water." is this for real? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 177.82.229.106 (talk) 11:43, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- A very good question - unencyclopedic image removed (of course details about the term's origins could be added in prose, based on independent reliable sources). GermanJoe (talk) 20:07, 6 July 2018 (UTC)