|WikiProject Albums||(Rated Stub-class)|
Professional review suggestion
As an editor at Crawdaddy!, and to comply with COI guidelines, I am not posting the link to this review of Dirty Projectors' Bitte Orca. However, I would like to recommend it on its merits, and hope that an editor will find the time to examine the review and—if he or she sees fit—post it to the professional reviews section. I appreciate your time. Crawdaddy! (favorable) 
Mike harkin (talk) 16:56, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
- As an independent reader/editor I would not hesitate in using your review as a source. As such, I will edit it within a couple of days to include your review. Life Now (talk) 02:25, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bitte Orca. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100115060622/http://blog.rhapsody.com/2009/12/best-albums-of-2009.html to http://blog.rhapsody.com/2009/12/best-albums-of-2009.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at
You may set the
|checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting
|needhelp= to your help request.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
If you are unable to use these tools, you may set
|needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.