Jump to content

Talk:Bo Xilai/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Oakley77 (talk · contribs) 01:54, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review

[edit]
  1. Well-written:
  2. Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (prose) Prose of this article is solid.  Pass
    (b) (MoS) This criteria has been followed.  Pass
  3. Verifiable with no original research:
  4. Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (references) 115 great refs.  Pass
    (b) (citations to reliable sources) Many reliable citations.  Pass
    (c) (original research) A pass here...  Pass
  5. Broad in its coverage:
  6. Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (major aspects) All major facets addressed.  Pass
    (b) (focused) Article is clear and focused, or in PRC words, it follows the glimmering, golden path towards harmony.  Pass
  7. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
  8. Notes Result
    Article is neutral.  Pass
  9. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
  10. Notes Result
    Article has high stability.  Pass
  11. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
  12. Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales) A pass here...  Pass
    (b) (appropriate use with suitable captions) Suitable captions.  Pass

Result

[edit]
Result Notes
 Pass This review has been pending long enough, the article is stable, textbook ad a GA.

Discussion

[edit]

I will be reviewing this for a bit, but during that time, please feel free to comment and help make this article a GA one. I also will be completing the review at intervals, so if you see the review half-done, be aware it will be completed soon. Thanks for the comments and input! I also attempt to make my reviews as concise and accurate as possible. Oakley77 (talk) 01:54, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for offering to review the page. As you may have noticed, there are still some fairly significant revisions being undertaken (see above discussion). I anticipate that these changes can move forward expeditiously and smoothly, but would you be willing to perhaps delay a final review for...I don't know, a week or so? Homunculus (duihua) 17:58, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with the writer; the very first thing I saw is stability concerns, since a lot is being modified right now. Once the revisions are done let us know, and this will be tagged for second opinion to make sure everything's set. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 02:03, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]