Talk:Bog standard
Appearance
2007-11-6 Automated pywikipediabot message
[edit]This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary. The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.) Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary. Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there. |
--CopyToWiktionaryBot 07:26, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Please cite your sources
[edit]As the linked article shows, there are many ideas about the source of this phrase, please reference any other cites Alastairward (talk) 13:30, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
Merge or redirect
[edit]This page is a mere dictionary definition (something which Wikipedia is [[WP:WINAD|not). It explains the meaning of a phrase and has a minor (and uncertain) usage note. Options to fix it include:
- Expand the page with encyclopedic content - that is, content that goes well beyond the merely lexical.
- Redirect the page to a more general discussion of the appropriate sub-genre of slang.
- Replace the current contents with a soft-redirect to Wiktionary (usually done using the {{wi}} template).
Pending a better answer, I'm implementing option 3 for now. Rossami (talk) 19:53, 7 February 2008 (UTC)