Talk:Dizrythmia

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the New Zealand music task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Crowded House (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crowded House, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Crowded HouseWikipedia:WikiProject Crowded HouseTemplate:WikiProject Crowded HouseCrowded House articles

Untitled[edit]

I've removed two bits of trivia in the article. They were edited back in the first time I cut them out; I personally don't feel them to be significant or relevant, and one of them was copied word-for-word from the Enzology website. Whomever edited them back in, please reply to this or send me a message if you disagree with the edit.--Theuniversal 02:42, 10 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'll grant that neither piece of trivia is earth-shaking or vital, but they're interesting asides and take nothing away from the article. The fact that two band members didn't like the final version of the "epic" track is significant, and the Bush connection is an odd coincidence. I don't understand why you see the need to remove these references from the article. (And I could always add a link to the Enzology site, if this is a particularly strong objection.) CJCurrie 23:09, 10 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I guess it wouldn't be all that great if I just went around vetoing everybody's decisions, so I'll just settle for having the source link in there (already done). Sorry for the minor edit war there.--TheUniversal 00:01, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 19:13, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]