Talk:BookSmart

This article was nominated for deletion on 24 October 2018. The result of the discussion was redirect.

A much more sophisticated product article than we usually see, since it does have 3rd party references, If anyone wants to delete it, please send it to AfD, for it may make for an interesting discussionDGG 00:37, 16 January 2007 (UTC) Examining it once again, i still see no reason for deleting it. It remains important, and has always been sourced. If he did something good and notable, then that's what it is. Whether a merge is in order will depend upon the separate notability of the company. DGG (talk) 09:42, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

from listserv[edit]

from liblicense-l, the most important and authoritative electronic resources listserv, moderated by ann Okerson of the Yale University Library. http://www.library.yale.edu/~llicense/ListArchives/0607/msg00274.html To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Print on Demand takes flight From: "Jim O'Donnell" <provost@georgetown.edu> Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 11:48:30 EDT Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Marshall McLuhan said that new technologies are usually interpreted as just doing what older technologies do, just faster or cheaper or with less physical effort. This is a sign that POD will not just make it easier for "publishers" and even "vanity publishers" to do what they've been doing already, but for new players to do new things with bound codex artifacts that they will call "books". We'll need a different name for the "reviewed, selected, edited, and disseminated to a wide audience" thing we've called "book" lately. Full article free for registered NYTimes users.

Jim O'Donnell Georgetown U.

NYTimes 7/20/06

July 20, 2006 Technology Rewrites the Book By PETER WAYNER [etc, ref in article]

DGG (talk) 10:21, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshot[edit]

Image:Blurb screengrab loRes.jpg is a poor screenshot - most of the space is devoted to the computer and the background. A straight screenshot would be more helpful without the other elements would be more helpful. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 23:56, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BookSmart 2.0[edit]

A new version came out around May 28th 2009. It features significantly more flexibilit (you can adapt templates) and support for a new large-sized square book. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.61.82.151 (talk) 07:21, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on BookSmart. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:49, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]