Talk:Bowsette/GA1

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Nova Crystallis (talk · contribs) 05:42, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I thought the fan art was fast, but this article surprised me more. I'll review it later. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 05:42, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Damn. I literally Googled this to see what it was. I saw "good article nominee" and instantly wanted to review it but I'm too slow. dannymusiceditor ^oops 21:44, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@DannyMusicEditor: As shown below, there was no point of claiming a review. You should've barged right in and started reviewing. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 22:48, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Opening statement

Rather than waiting on the above, I will be taking over. Let's write about some memes.

For replying to Reviewer comment, please use Done, Fixed, Added, Not done, Doing..., or Removed, followed by any comment you'd like to make. I will be crossing out my comments as they are redressed, and only mine. A detailed, section-by-section review will follow after this and my first comment (Referencing). –♠Vami _IV†♠ 22:27, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing and prose

I cannot find any outstanding errors in the prose and referencing. However, Esquire does not have an enWiki article and is currently linking to the noble title. However, I think more needs to be written about whatever copyright implications this character has, lest it wind up being redirected to Bowser's article. I otherwise see no reason not to just quick-pass this article. –♠Vami _IV†♠ 22:57, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Vami IV: Unfortunately that's all there was for concerns over how the character itself falls under copyright, just enough to note there were some on Japan's end. As for the Equire wikilink, that's

Done.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 23:15, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Very well. At the risk of controversy, I am quick-passing Bowsette. God bless you. –♠Vami _IV†♠ 23:22, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA Progress

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.