From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Primates (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Primates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Primates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.


I would question the opinions about which primates should be included under the category of brachiators. I am currently taking a course on human evolution with Biruté Galdikas, and both her lecture material and the course text (Humankind emerging, 8th ed) firmly classify orangutans and most other great apes as brachiators. In addition, the primary reason claimed for the development of brachiation as a method of mobility is size (weight). For a small 4 ounce monkey, running around on top of branches on all fours is easy. Once you start to exceed a certain weight, balance becomes far more difficult, and it simply becomes easier to swing underneath branches with your arms.

Humans, at least according to Galdikas, are still anatomically brachiators. The only traits we seem to have lost are the extremely long arms and the upper body musculature. Our skeletal structure is still very well adapted to swinging around branches.

(later, by another author) This is a terrible stub for many reasons but especially because of this: brachiators 'by design'? That term should never appear in an evolutionary biology context. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 19:43, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brachiator. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:51, 7 November 2016 (UTC)