Talk:Brangelina

This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page:
• Supercouple
Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at:
• Talk:Supercouple

This article was nominated for deletion on 6 July 2015. The result of the discussion was redirect to Supercouple#Celebrity.

This redirect was nominated at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion on 2016 January 20. The result of the discussion was Keep.

Brangelina Book by Ian Halperin

Brangelina is the title of the new biography by Ian Halperin (Go check his website ianundercover.com). He's the author of "Unmasked: The Final Years of Michael Jackson." The book will delve into the private life of the famous couple. For more information go to:http://www.transitpublishing.com/Brangelina.php K8989n (talk) 21:35, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Zee Goggles! They do nothing!

Comon' wikipedia... Brangelina??? Seriously!? 202.154.82.121 (talk) 06:27, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. I wouldn't say that they do nothing. For example, their acts of humanitarianism have certainly received a good amount of press. Flyer22 (talk) 04:53, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That was a simpsons reference, sir. I believe IP was questioning the very existence of an article with this title. Zmdi (talk) 14:55, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am female, and I know what the IP was questioning. The reference is still basically asking, "What do they do that merits a Wikipedia article?" I decided to simply respond to the "They do nothing!" part. As for this article's title, that can be changed if that alone is the problem; see the Relationship of Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes article talk page about that. I already brought up the existence of this Brangelina article, not long after it was re-created, on the Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie talk pages. I stated that it was/is not needed, but no editor there was too eager to delete it (though it was pretty clearly stated that it was redundant with regard to information already covered elsewhere on Wikipedia, such as in the Supercouple article). Flyer22 (talk) 00:57, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh Gosh! This article is so stupid! Seriously!! Now is wikipedia a gossip site? Lucazeppelin (talk) 09:43, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You could seek deletion. The article seems to have been accepted, though, as it was brought up on the Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie talk pages (and I was for a merge). It's not about being a gossip site, however; it's about whether or not the couple is notable enough to have an article about them, as well as splitting stuff out of their individual articles about their relationship and into this one so that more room is freed up in those individual articles. Flyer22 (talk) 18:51, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Break-up

Their break-up is mentioned nowhere.--Dvd-junkie (talk) 07:14, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is not mentioned because it is only speculation...right now anyway. Flyer22 (talk) 02:24, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Adoptions

The table of children gives the dates that Pitt adopted the children, which in two cases was later than Jolie. Surely both dates should be included? (Or if only one, it should be the first, but I think both would be better.) Salopian (talk) 02:55, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not against it. Go for it. Flyer22 (talk) 17:49, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Changing article name?

Brangelina just sounds bad? suggesting change to Brad and Angelina, respectively. If this article is even noteworthy, considering it is covered in their articles. k_scheik (talk) 20:36, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

seconded! Solchant (talk) 21:25, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]