Jump to content

Talk:Bretonstone

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bretonstone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:03, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Patents

[edit]

Article currently states "Bretonstone is a patented technology[1][2] invented in the early-1970s[citation needed]". The first two citations are currently to U.S. published pre-grant patent applications US20060119002 and US20090253829, which do not by themselves constitute evidence of being "patented". And anything invented in the early 1970s would be off patent now (roughly 50 years later). The entire description of patents in confusing at best and simply wrong at worst. US9199415B2 is a granted patent related to US20090253829. But Marcello Toncelli is an inventor named on earlier patents like [[1]], DE2054168B2, IT1013554B, and US4204820. It is hard to tell what the intent of the article really is, because "Bretonstone" is a tradename/brand name and not something with a fixed scientific/technical. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.93.254.193 (talk) 02:32, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the prior language was misleading at best. It reads more like a brand advertisement than a technical description, and inaccurately states that the technology is currently covered by a patent. JM Dahl (talk) 14:36, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]