Jump to content

Talk:British Traditional Wicca/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

BTW

I think it should be pointed out that in British Paganism, the term BTW means "British Traditional Witchcraft", and therefore specifically excludes Wicca and all its offshoots. TharkunColl 23:34, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Whereas on the western side of the pond, what you call BTW is beginning to be called TIW (Traditional Initiatory Witchcraft), such as Cochranite, Tubal Cain, 1734, Regency, and Roebuck type groups.--Vidkun 00:05, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
From the first version this has contained 'The term "British Traditional Witchcraft" was suggested, mainly in the United States, as an uncontroversial label for the New Forest-descended covens, but that term is used in Britain to refer to those traditions, such as Cochrane's, that claim a heritage predating Gardner's publications, but not related to Gardner's groups or recent predecessors of it.' Which makes the difference clear enough - though I'm currently fact-checking that, from what I can currently make out "British Traditional Wicca" was coined by the New Wiccan Church people without any reference to British Traditional Witchcraft and I was hence incorrect in this regard, but I'm not going to edit to include this until I'm more sure and can cite. I haven't come across BTW as an initialism for "British Traditional Witchcraft" except were it happens due to BTW meaning British Traditional Wicca being confused, which in turn comes from the very confusion on the meaning of "Wicca" that lead to the coining of the "British Traditional Wicca" in the first place. Still, I'm from IE, not US or GB so I couldn't say what is vernacular of either of those countries, only what I can find attested (for the record, IME in Ireland "Wicca" normally means BTW amongst Pagans, especially witches, but has the same definition as Wikipedia gives it amongst non-Pagans and some Pagan cowans)Talliesin (talk) 01:27, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on British Traditional Wicca. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:23, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed merge with Algard Wicca

Algard Wicca doesn't seem notable enough to warrant it's own article, but could be noted in a section on BTW traditions. Woodsy lesfem (talk) 02:50, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Gardnerian Wicca would seem to be a better destination, based on the description of its roots on the Algard Wicca page, and the lede of Gardnerian Wicca where it is described as a "derived branch". Klbrain (talk) 04:08, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
  checkY Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 06:40, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:British_Traditional_Wicca/Archive_1&oldid=1061155662"