Talk:Broadcatching

Podcasting Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Podcasting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of notable podcasts and podcast-related information on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PodcastingWikipedia:WikiProject PodcastingTemplate:WikiProject Podcastingpodcasting articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Grammar Police

compare = compared (section "Broadcatching of copyrighted television broadcasts") Also some comma errors.

Link Spam?

Although it probably wasn't intentional, all those links to Broadcatching software just makes this feel like link SPAM. Should probably remove them. --Charles Iliya Krempeaux 01:13, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am done. Any feedback? -- Mayuresh 00:23, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think it needs a one or two sentence quick summary of what broadcasting is at the start of the article. It jumps immediately into history. See Podcasting for an example of a good and concise introduction. Other than that its a decent rewrite. --Ben Houston 01:47, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

>> Done. Its not the best, but it should hold until something better comes along. --mskadu 00:09, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can anyone recommend a bittorrent client that can do broadcatching that will work on the Intel Mac platform? As I understand, azureus is not currently supported through rosetta. --DDG 22:46, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

look at the new comparison table in the client article! --mabdul 0=* 23:28, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blurb about the MPAA teaming up with uTorrent, Bittorrent

I added the following paragraph to the article:

It should be noted that a lot of the uTorrent user base has switched to other clients such as the open source Miro because the makers of Bittorrent and the newly acquired uTorrent have teamed up with the MPAA in order to catch illegal file sharers.[1][2][3][4]

I added that because that section suggests that even though it may be illegal, that there seems to be no prosecutions taking place. The way that text is written seems to make it sound like it would be a good idea to download copyrighted works using software that is strongly linked to the MPAA!!!

That seems a lot like baiting people to me!!! I thought it would only be fair to warn unknowing people about that.

Wisepiglet (talk) 09:21, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, no, those are unfounded accusations. There has not been to date any instances of uTorrent communicating sensitive information to web servers. Those are baseless accusations. Your part about teaming up with the MPAA to catch file sharers is not cited. Besides, that does not belong in the Broadcatch article. I am removing it from the article, and I'll remove it from any other articles you've put it on. 98.127.173.231 (talk) 04:16, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No notes on standards or formats?

Shouldn't there be links to standards and formats? "rss + bittorrent" hardly defines what the format is. There must be one as so many programs are picking them up, but it's not mRSS. --eduo (talk) 23:00, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Bittorrent + RSS" "most used" application of broadcatching?

Sounds like whoever wrote this hasn't heard of podcasting. Unless someone can segregate podcasting from broadcatching, there needs to be a citation showing that more torrents are being broadcaught(?) than audio and video "podcasts" via direct download, which is hardly likely. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.241.73.12 (talk) 17:21, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"As of 2010, there has been no legal action taken against sharers of TV episodes"

What has happened in the six years since that quote? I have heard news about HBO going after those sharing Game of Thrones episodes, but that's very recent. Either way this needs updating. --Shawn K. Quinn (talk) 06:18, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Broadcatching. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://broadcatch.com/definition.shtml
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040806190621/http://www.corante.com:80/importance/archives/002279.html to http://www.corante.com/importance/archives/002279.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040714081624/http://www.corante.com:80/importance/archives/002378.html to http://www.corante.com/importance/archives/002378.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:00, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]