Jump to content

Talk:Buddy Fletcher/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Hi! I will be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have the full review up soon. Dana boomer (talk) 20:04, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    • The lead should be a summary of the entire article. Therefore, it shouldn't contain information not included in the body of the article and so doesn't need references, unless they are being used to back up a direct quote.
    • Would it be possible to combine the "Philanthropy" and "Service" sections, possible (but not necessarily) renaming the section to "Philanthropy and service"? These two sections seem to me to fit well together, and they would benefit from not being split.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    • Reference titles shouldn't be in all capital letters, even if the original source title is, per MOS.
    • Ref #8 needs a publisher, as does #15
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Overall, a nicely written article. I have a couple of questions/comments about MOS and referencing, so I am putting the article on hold until these can be resolved. Drop me a note here or on my talk page if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 20:26, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Everything looks good, so I'm passing the article. Nice work! Dana boomer (talk) 12:28, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]