Jump to content

Talk:Cöln-class cruiser/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 14:41, 8 October 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
    Probably should add state for NIP books.
    Added. Parsecboy (talk) 14:10, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    You might consider adding a summary table giving each ship's construction and fate info like I did for C and D class destroyer. I find that it presents the info better for classes with a lot of members. Not a requirement, but just a suggestion.
    That's a good idea. Parsecboy (talk) 14:10, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    B. Focused:
    Link boilers.
    Added. Parsecboy (talk) 14:10, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: