Talk:Calbuco

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was page moved speedily as it is obvious that the move of 12/10 was controversial JHunterJ (talk) 22:22, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Calbuco, Los Lagos → Calbuco — should be moved because the commune and cuty of Calbuco is what is most commonly refered by "Calbuco", when speaking about the volcano or channel it is (in spanish) added Volcán or Canal. --Dentren | ^Talk 03:07, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The city of Calbuco is the primary meaning of Calbuco just like in the case of Osorno, Osorno is primarily understood as a city, and only when specified a volcano. Take a look at a google seach[1] 18 pages of 20 showing the city and 2 of 20 showing the volcano. Here on the web [2], of the 11 first google hits only one is about the volcano and 8 are about the city and commune. Please discuss here before moving the page.Dentren | ^Talk 21:03, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose It is not in the policies of WP to use such kind of google stats for disambiguation determination. Please read WP:DAB TrueColour (talk) 21:30, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The fact that it is not included in policies of WP does not change to the point. Where that it says that google stats can not be used to determine relevance? While TrueColor have contested this point he has not presented, here, any argument of why the city of Calbuco is not the primary meaning of Calbuco and on why there should be a disambiguation page on Calbuco. Dentren | ^Talk 23:06, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]