Talk:California State Route 149/GA1
GA Review
[edit]GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- Needs some work.
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- Some sections are not references (e.g. last sentence in lead)
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- Per above
- C. No original research:
- Last sentence in lead ("bottleneck")
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Need some images
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Per above
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Sorry, but this article needs a lot of work before GA. ~~ ĈĠ (☺ - Review!) Simple? 14:08, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail:
- What needs work? You didn't specify any prose issues, the lead does not have to be cited, and images aren't a requirement. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 21:24, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
- This article can be quick-failed since it has an {{expand}}. However, this is an unacceptable review. CG, you need to be specific about the problems that the article has. The comments you made above are unacceptable. --Rschen7754 (T C) 18:39, 25 September 2008 (UTC)