Talk:Campania-class cruiser/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 20:56, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
I'll get to this shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:56, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
- No DABs
- No pics or line drawings are available?
- Nothing I've been able to track down - there was File:Varo RN Basilicata.jpg, but it was determined at the Italian list ACR that without a publication date, we couldn't use it.
- Specify that the displacement in the infobox is full load
- Done
- Use ftin when converting from meters.
- Can you tell that this is an old article?
- ;-)
- Can you tell that this is an old article?
- Specify and link type of boiler in the infobox and tell the reader that the engines in the infobox that they're steam engines
- Done
- Link ihp in the infobox
- Done
- Link naval cadets, register, broadside
- Done
- She was also equipped Pronoun problem
- Fixed - good catch
- on each broadside in sponsoned on the main deck Missing word?
- Fixed
- Both of these guns were manufactured by Ansaldo and were designed in 1912 and 1917, respectively. Design date not important here. Fold Andsaldo into the preceding sentence.
- Reworked - that whole section was a bit confusing
- explain L/40
- Fixed
- Not entirely. They were also equipped with two Ansaldo 76 mm (3.0 in) L40 guns and three 76 mm 40-cal. guns in anti-aircraft mountings Rework this to say that two guns were in low-angle mounts and 3 in high-angle ones or somesuch. Also, if you're going to give shell weight for these guns, you should definitely do it for the 152mm ones.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:30, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
- Good catch - ctrl+F for "L/" didn't spot that one ;) Oddly enough, I can't get a shell weight for the 152mm - neither Friedman nor Conway's provides it (Conway's doesn't include the 40-cal. version in the table, and the shell weight varied between the 50-cal and 45-cal guns of that caliber). Parsecboy (talk) 17:59, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
- Strange, but not that critical. Aren't the low-angle and high-angle guns, the same weapons, just on different mounts? I'll let you sort that out on your own.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:19, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
- Good catch - ctrl+F for "L/" didn't spot that one ;) Oddly enough, I can't get a shell weight for the 152mm - neither Friedman nor Conway's provides it (Conway's doesn't include the 40-cal. version in the table, and the shell weight varied between the 50-cal and 45-cal guns of that caliber). Parsecboy (talk) 17:59, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
- Not entirely. They were also equipped with two Ansaldo 76 mm (3.0 in) L40 guns and three 76 mm 40-cal. guns in anti-aircraft mountings Rework this to say that two guns were in low-angle mounts and 3 in high-angle ones or somesuch. Also, if you're going to give shell weight for these guns, you should definitely do it for the 152mm ones.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:30, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
- Fixed
- Merge the appropriate cells in the table and link the headings
- Dunno why I only half did that to start with...
- Where in the world is Etobicoke?
