Talk:Canaan Valley

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: West Virginia Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	West Virginia portal This article is supported by WikiProject West Virginia (assessed as Mid-importance).

"Forest-unfriendly" to "forest-friendly"

No, this is not an "unconstructive edit". I was the original editor of the paragraph in question. For some reason, a mistaken editor has changed my "forest-unfriendly" to "forest-friendly" (which is wrong)... Check the history... Please leave my edit in place. 96.231.137.242 (talk) 02:31, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE: Your history makes it hard to tell at first glance, which makes it hard to judge, but it appears the issue is a content dispute at Canaan Valley. This appears not to be vandalism, as I and several other vandal fighters first thought. 96.231.137.242, can you source some information/references that show you are right about your contention that the climate 75,000 years ago made the valley unfriendly to forests? Cool and moist environments are usually good for forests, so it looks like you are wrong on the face of it. I for one will not revert you further, and will remove your warning if you can come up with anything proving your statement. Currently you have no references, which is why you keep getting reverted. Yours in good faith, Jus da fax 02:40, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. My source for this info was the film already in the Ref section: Freshwater Institute and West Virginia Audubon Council (n.d. [but 1980s]), The Canaan Valley: A National Treasure, 12 minute educational film. Difficult to check, I know, but that is where it came from.... 96.231.137.242 (talk) 03:09, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
As far as "on the face of it": During the last Glacial Maximum, the climate in the Canaan Valley was tundra-like... Treeless... So, it does make sense... 96.231.137.242 (talk) 03:15, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'm pulling the warning I gave you. You might put something of that in the text as well. Suggest contacting the other editors to remove warnings. Best wishes, Jus da fax 03:38, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]