Talk:Capital punishment/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- Make the list prose, however, these are still okay, but I will say no.
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- Requires more citations in sections "History" and "Movements towards humane execution."
- C. No original research:
- Questionable in the "Global distribution" to name one.
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- Definitely one the better parts of this article.
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Broad range of views.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- Seems to have a history of vandalism...
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- I would recommend adding an image in the lead section.
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- I recommend fixing what I said needs to be fixed. This is making more prose and more references please. Obviously, the stable-ness of article can't be change because it is about such a controversial topic. --The New Mikemoral ♪♫ 23:18, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail: