Talk:Cascade effect

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spaceflight Low‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Is there any other type of space flight besides space flight beyond Earth?

..known as the Kessler syndrome. It is theorized that if this occurs, space flight beyond Earth will become very difficult if not impossible.

What other types of space flights are there? --TiagoTiago (talk) 22:12, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cascade causality is the same but generalized and not negative

In metaphysical naturalism anything is a cascade effect (but here the term is neutral). Even probabilistic events described by wave functions are Everettianly multifurcating events.

Antispirituality/antispiritualism

Spirituality doesn't have procedural theories of how the phenomena happen. Spirituality has logical gaps. It never explains the causal series of actions as ever-evolving cascading connectomes. Rigorous science factually does exactly that. Spirituality isn't compatible with science. Ontic states are actual phenomena regardless of human interpretation and knowledge (epistemological description). Ontic states are specific and causal; even wave functions which evolve probabilistically are defined rigorously. Ontic states aren't spiritual. Metaphysical naturalists are a minority. They deserve more rights in society.

Fault tree vs. event tree

The text contains a valid reference to an event tree, but the visual on the right side shows a fault tree - which is top-down and not bottom-up as the cascade effect. So it's a misleading and wrong picture, which should be removed or replaced. 2003:E0:2F04:D00:50EC:37CA:2EE7:4FF8 (talk) 21:51, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]