Talk:Censorship in Italy/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions about Censorship in Italy. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Reasons for the stubbification of this article

Aside the countless sections that didn't include a single reference and could thus be removed on sight (WP:V), some sections did include some refs, but they didn't comply with WP:RS. Below is the list of all 13 references as they appeared here, with an explanation of why they were removed.

^ [1] FreedomHouse Map
^ Italian condemned tv show
^ Italy's ban on foreign operators opens a new front in Europe's battle for a 'common market' for gambling
^ I Know This Is A Trite Title, But ... It's Not Just China (strong language)
^ Sed Lex/Quando il Ministro viola la legge (in Italian)
^ Censure negli anime (in Italian)
^ Movie censorship from the Italian Wikipedia
^ [http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gJFGPyEcFHzHcv6EvRdJfjF3I9OwD9ABD99G1 'Videocracy' ads can't air on Italy state TV- AP- (in English)
^ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radioactive_waste#Illegal_dumping
^ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polychlorinated_dibenzodioxins#Dioxin_exposure_incidents
^ http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diossine#Disastri_e_casi_notevoli_relativi_alle_diossine
^ http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crisi_dei_rifiuti_in_Campania
^ http://www.lastampa.it/redazione/cmsSezioni/spettacoli/200909articoli/47144girata.asp

- kept
- kept
- kept
- kept
- kept
Someone's personal website: self-published
Wikipedia
- kept
Wikipedia
Wikipedia
Wikipedia
Wikipedia
mostly because of POV and poor English ("the only independent journalistic TV program in Italy"), could be reinstated if someone is willing to write a meaningful phrase about it.

--93.45.79.3 (talk) 04:39, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

POV

It covers only Berlusconi's time and not past or leftwing or catholic censorship .. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.31.136.72 (talk) 20:38, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Well, you are free to add something about it youself, as long as its verified by reliable sources.--93.45.133.14 (talk) 09:10, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

==

"she was following a case of weapon and illegal toxic waste[12] [13][14][15]traffic in which she believed also the Italian Army and other institutions were involved.list of Italian killed journalists" where are references about the italian army involved in trafficking toxic wastes??

"On 2009 the journalistic TV program in Italy, Report, was left without legal assistance, allowing journalists of the TV program to be forced to close their activity." can anyone explain me because i watch this tv program every sunday on italian television if it was forced to be closed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.10.230.128 (talk) 16:31, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

turkey - western europe

I doubt it —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.191.81.145 (talk) 07:25, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

LOL..

I am writing from Italy. Berlusconi is a shit. And I am free to say it. Byez.--188.153.38.159 (talk) 17:29, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

I'm still free. Why? :D Please arrest me! :D --2.40.51.128 (talk) 22:16, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Big big problem. Censorship in Italy does not work. I am Italian and I am still free to speak and to write, from Italy, here and elsewhere that Berlusconi is a shit. We have a big big problem. Please help us... I WANT TO BE ARRESTED!--2.40.61.30 (talk) 16:25, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Voice totally fucked up...

There are sections about the modern Italy first, then after sections about Fascist Italy WITHOUT any explanation of the change of historical dateline... --188.153.63.4 (talk) 00:24, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

fixed --Juanm (talk) 15:51, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Li chiamarono... briganti!

Who censored what? Crap! Anyway the film was published in DVD http://www.dvd-store.it/DVD/DVD-Video/ID-34853/Li-chiamarono-briganti.aspx

Please improve this entire voice, it is ridicolous.--TheDRaKKaR (talk) 05:59, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Agreed. It pictures Italy like if it were North Korea. Also, not so coherent. Half of the page is dedicated to say that newspapers are politically oriented, but then only links from "La Repubblica" are displayed in order to justify the behavior of some people. Quite a good example of POV. --TheLazza (talk) 13:48, 31 August 2014 (UTC)