Talk:Channel Nine

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles

Disambiguation

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Slogans

See Talk:Channel Ten for discussion on network slogans. Tntnnbltn 17:57, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Logos

Please keep the logo section only for main Channel Nine logos since 1963. I am having to continuously remove logos which do not belong. Thanks. Stickeylabel 23:34, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Does the living color logo need to be there? The nine logo was the nine dots and the number, the 'living color' text was just what was shown on the ident and not part of the logo. --Whitehornmatt 09:54, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, I have removed the Nine 'Living Color' Logo from the article. Stickeylabel 11:17, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Current Logo

Is the current logo [Image:NineNetworkLogo.png] or, [Image:Channelnine.svg]???

I thought it was the first log, not the second. I have always been under the impression the second logo was only used in some publicity?

Where did you find out when the logo changed?

talk to symode09's or Reveiw Me! 14:57, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Damaging advertisement"

"Rumours of a new logo surfaced after a damaging newspaper advertisement featuring the "Nine dots" from the Seven Network went unresponded by Nine." This appears both unsubstantiated and irrelevant, and I've removed it for the moment. Cyril Washbrook 05:44, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]