Talk:Charles Wenner House

This article was nominated for deletion on 25 September 2015. The result of the discussion was keep.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Charles Wenner House article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Illinois Low‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Category:Former National Register of Historic Places in Illinois?

Has this site been officially delisted? If so, we should add Category:Former National Register of Historic Places in Illinois. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 18:05, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since there seems to be some question as to the current status of the site (demolished, or refurbished and occupied), and if the photo is of the site or down the street, the best course for now is to remove all the un-sourced info about the current status, and remove the photo. Any new info (with source) is welcome. Generic1139 (talk) 02:02, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To echo my comment on your talk page, I agree that we should remove the photo and the info about the current status until we can get confirmation of it (either a source explaining its fate, or if it's still standing a photo of the house). TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 02:08, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]