This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
I tagged the article using Twinkle, so I thought I'd explain my reasoning here. The tag shouldn't have been removed since the issues are fairly obvious, but I'm assuming good faith on the part of the author who simply might not know any better. The prose can be rewritten easily enough; I might have done so myself, except that I haven't read the book. More concerning are the lack of reliable sources. It appears this article was uploaded to the mainspace without the usual oversight afforded by AfC. Neither of the sources (which are primary), unfortunately, meet the standards of a reliable source. The prose, aside from the issue of grammar, also contains a significant amount of peacock words. Choudhury, I'm not trying to be harsh. But these are problems that need to be addressed, especially as I'm not sure this meets the critera for inclusion. Quinto Simmaco (talk) 13:15, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
