Jump to content

Talk:Chicago XXXII: Stone of Sisyphus/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention needed

This article could be improved by dividing it into sections; see Wikipedia:Guide to layout#Structure of the article. Also, the article does not cite its sources.
-,-~R'lyehRising~-,- 12:17, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

I divided the article into sections, cleaned up some grammar, and added more background information including external links. It is extremely difficult to locate any official citations regarding this topic, as the band never issued an official press release. Additionally, the band actively prevents discussion of the album in official forums. fallout 20:41, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Album or not?

This article is clearly of interest to Chicago fans, and is relevant to the band's history -- but because it was never released, I don't believe it should include an album infobox, nor should it be included in Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums. Anyone else have an opinion on this? --Engineer Bob 23:43, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

I think it should, because something does not have to be released to be an album. It was recorded, the masters exist (because virtually all of the songs ended up appearing in one form or another on other projects), and everything was done short of printing it. --Aguerriero (talk) 23:48, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Along those same lines... There never was any album artwork. Dawayne Bailey worked with an artist to replicate CLOSELY what was going to be used, but it was by no means the final. Remove the image?

The Pull in concert

Added a sentence on The Pull being preformed live at the Greek Theater. And no, I'm not making this up as I have the Warner Repise Video VHS tape of the concert. The cover to the tape lists the concert as taking place July 9, 1993 in some blurb about that particular night. The Pull appears about halfway through the concert and Lamm really got the audiance to cheer for the new song, introducing it as something they were working on for the next Chicago albumn. --annonymous 9/12/06

P2P bootleg?

I saw this album on a search on ISO Hunt a few weeks ago. I guess that someone must have copies of this as a unoffical release. I thought this was bs.Rio de oro (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 22:22, 19 January 2008 (UTC)