Talk:Children of the Thunder

This article was nominated for deletion on 12 December 2018. The result of the discussion was keep.

Novels: Sci-fi Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Science fiction task force.

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

main thesis

The main thesis of the review is that the book is about sexual freedom and the negative side effects which may occur.
I don't agree with that.
Brunner created a last cry of a prophet not honored in his own land. He just got mad about all the ever rising stupidity (in his notion) in society, politics, culture, arts etc. And he created a plan of revenge: "Infect the world with a dominant mutation of man who do use their brain." That's the plot. This sexual thesis is just a reflex of not willing to see the obvious. With this thesis the creation of a dominant mutation makes no sense but is counterproductive.

Maybe I reread the book some day and rework this article. Horst Emscher (talk) 16:09, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Which is to say that this article is basically original research. Richardson mcphillips (talk) 19:14, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Everything except the first sentence is OR. So please DONT delete the article but delete the OR. (Tried to do this, but the bot wont let me.] 95.90.115.121 (talk) 17:05, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]