From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Geology / Meteorites  (Rated C-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon Chondrule is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Meteorites task force (marked as High-importance).


Hi! From the edit history, I gather that there once was a "chondrite" page, but since it didn't really contain much that was new it got merged into chondrule and changed to a redirect.

However, when I came to adding more information to this article, there was quite a bit of stuff which just didn't fit nicely under the title "chondrule". So, somewhat gingerly, I have resurrected chondrite, this time containing stuff which is new. Deuar 21:13, 26 November 2005 (UTC)


Anyone can explain why X-Wind page redirects here? -- 13:08, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Maybe, because there exists a theory involving the x-wind for the formation of the chondrules. (talk) 01:54, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Science report[edit]

This week in Science magazine (20 June 2008, Vol 320, Issue 5883) there is an article titled The Formation Conditions of Chondrules and Chondrites. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 15:08, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Inappropriate link removal[edit]

I do not agree with users Mannheim_34 and Ohnoitsjamie with their removal of any link to webpages hosted on a commercial website (almost any .com domain). I expressed my opinion here and here. I ask to the community: are these in your opinion links to "web pages that primarily exist to sell products or services, or to web pages with objectionable amounts of advertising"?

I don't want to start an edit war so if you agree with my point of view please restore any suitable reference removed [1] from this article. Thanks. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 22:29, 18 March 2009 (UTC)