Jump to content

Talk:Churchmead School

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ofsted reckons that Churchmead is a comprehensive - please see http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/portal/site/Internet/menuitem.7c7b38b14d870c7bb1890a01637046a0/?event=getReport&urn=133580&inspectionNumber=295504&providerCategoryID=8192&fileName=\\school\\133\\s5_133580_20070613.xml (ofsted report of 2-3 May 2007, accessed 5/8/2007) so I have amended the article as appropriate. Grblundell 14:14, 5 August 2007 (UTC) 5/8/2007[reply]

DCSF says it was a secondary modern in 2002 [1] but in 2003 it became a comprehensive [2]. CR7 21:47, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

I believe that www.rhystowey.com should be added to external links as he is a Churchmead Student and it shows the work that Students can/have achieved. It makes the School look better when visitors look at this Wikipedia Article and discover work of Students.

Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.40.102.122 (talk) 21:00, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that the wikipedia article isn't meant to show Churchmead in a good light - or in a bad light either. The point of all articles in wikipedia should be to give as unbiased a report as possible of the facts. And external links have to be of substantial relevance. So Rhys's website shouldn't be referenced. Grblundell (talk) 14:17, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately the above link keeps getting added to this article, and others, sometimes from various IPs in the course of a day, and as an "external link". I can only think that this is an attempt to use Wikipedia for spamming, and would recommend the above link be removed on this basis too. Rapido (talk) 15:09, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Churchmead School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:29, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]