Talk:Chymosin

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

in humans gene not expressed?

At present the article states "Chymosin is produced by gastric chief cells in infants..." and "The gene is found in humans (on chromosome 1), but it is not expressed." These seem to be contradictory statements to me, is it that the gene is only expressed during infancy, or is something else going on here. In any case the article would benefit from this being made more clear. --Keithonearth (talk) 17:49, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you. The article should be more clear. Active chymosin has not clearly found in humans, and babies don't digest milk using chymosin as the article wrongly states. However, there is a human non functional pseudogene related with prochymosine.--Miguelferig (talk) 18:37, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Miguelferig, could you correct the article. The citation for the fact seems to deal with sheep, not human infants. I don't have the background necessary to fix it myself. Thanks! --Glubbdrubb (talk) 11:45, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've changed some sentences and added two new references.--Miguelferig (talk) 17:32, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! --Glubbdrubb (talk) 18:55, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There are multiple WP:RSs that state that human infant stomachs do secrete chymosin, but that after infancy human stomachs no longer secrete it; and there are multiple WP:RSs that state that human infant stomachs do not secrete chymosin. I don't know which idea is right, and probably will not pour over a study session today to find out, but if the idea above is actually correct, then this article should acknowledge the widespread idea found in reliable sources of human infant chymosin, and say that it is misguided (if that is in fact what current science believes). Quercus solaris (talk) 18:43, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chymosin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150326181805/http://www.gmo-compass.org/eng/database/enzymes/83.chymosin.html to http://www.gmo-compass.org/eng/database/enzymes/83.chymosin.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:35, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]