Jump to content

Talk:Cichlid/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Reassessment

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, listed below. I will check back in seven days. If these issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far.

  • There are at least three dead links.[1]
Taxonomy
  • This section needs reworking to avoid the external links in the "details can be found here" comments. External links should only appear in the external links section.
  • The last paragraph is rather vaguely attributed.
  • The citation style should be consistent throughout the article.
Range and habitat
  • "Chakrabarty concludes from his review of phylogenetic analyses that vicariance is the only explanation." Need to explain who Chakrabarty is.
Diet
  • The first paragraph, which contains the claim that "Cichlids are astonishingly diverse in terms of diet", needs to be cited. Who is astonished?
Images of cichlids
  • I'm unconvinced that this is an article that can justify the inclusion of an image gallery. I'd suggest replacing it with a link to Commons.

--Malleus Fatuorum 19:18, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As these issues remain unaddressed, this article has now been delisted. --Malleus Fatuorum 22:26, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.