Jump to content

Talk:Circuit identification code

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. Jafeluv (talk) 10:42, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Circuit identification code -> Circuit Identification Code

Per WP:CAPS and WP:TITLE: this is a proper noun referring to a single specific field in a single standard. It does not refer to a general identification code for circuits. — Dgtsyb (talk) 22:14, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose. This is not a proper name. There is not one single code called "Circuit Identification Code", but many. See a Googlebooks search on "circuit identification codes".
Neither WP:CAPS nor WP:TITLE gives support to this RM.
NoeticaTea? 00:53, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Request Merge with Circuit ID article

[edit]

The mainspace article, Circuit ID, is much longer and much more detailed. I'd recommend merging the two and developing redirects. --TadgStirkland401 (TadgTalk) 12:00, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]