Talk:Claroline

This article was nominated for deletion on August 7, 2007. The result of the discussion was Speedy Close.

Sources[edit]

The main source for something like this is their own web site, which is totally OK by me. yamaplos 15:59, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Deletion tag[edit]

Adding a db-spam tag by an unregistered user is rather inappropriate. The article might be rewritten, but it should be clear that this program warrants an article. If you have clear arguments for deletion, please post them on the talk page or propose alternative actions. LHOON 20:13, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Claims are suspicious[edit]

The article claims that the "thing" is available in 35 languages but there are wery few available in wiki. I suspect overstatment. I suggest adding a db-spam tag. 134.214.60.125 (talk) 19:11, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is clearly an overstatment, I suggest adding just a deletion tag. 134.214.60.88 (talk) 18:52, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Claroline. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20121205134648/http://www.ipm.ucl.ac.be/ to http://www.ipm.ucl.ac.be/
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://claroline.net.type/consortium

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:41, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]