Talk:Climate of Chicago

Illinois Low‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chicago Mid‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Weather: Climate Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Climate task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Weather Changes[edit]

I would like to know why exactly the weather fluctuates so dramatically in Chicago. The fact that it does is mentioned but no explanation is provided.

I believe that it is because of neighboring Lake Michigan. Contrary to the sea, which is slow to absorb heat and likewise slow to release it, Lake Michigan is too small to have much of a long term effect on the weather with the exception of slightly milder temperatures on the coastline and breezes. It is basically like any other city in a temperate inland zone. So, there's your answer, but I can't verify it so I won't put it up there.

However, remember to refrain from comments like this, as Wikipedia is not a discussion forum. Yeah, I know, i know...I'm sort of a hypocrite, but anyways...

--Starstriker7(^{Say hi}_{or see my works}) 23:59, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wind?[edit]

What, no mention of winds in an article about the climate of the Windy City? Loganberry (Talk) 15:59, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a paragraph on winds and the history of the Windy City nickname. InNuce 02:35, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

==

In the article it mentions that August is the rainiest month, but in the table is shows that June is, by far, the rainiest month. So which is it really? bob rulz 21:40, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

August is the wettest month. The data in the table comes from weather.com, run by the Weather Channel, and the data in the text comes frmo Tom Skilling, the chief meteorologist at the Chicago Tribune. I was planning on reconciling the article by adding the Tribune data into the table, but I've encountered difficulty in obtaining the Tribune data again, so I'm still waiting. I'll change it next time I have a chance. RyanG e rbil10 (Drop on in!) 22:08, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've updated the table to reflect the current "official" 30-year Chicago averages as recorded by the National Climatic Data Center. I also updated the text to match these numbers. It turns out the weather.com data originally used for the table are for the old Meigs field reporting station. Meigs hasn't been the official Chicago station for over 40 years; I suspect that's why the numbers seem so out-of-date. The updated table is now in agreement with both the NCDC and weather.com's (O'Hare ) averages.InNuce 18:31, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

These are out of sync again. Someone with access to accurate data should really definitively coordinate the text with the chart. It looks really stupid to have them constantly out of sync. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.80.84.227 (talk) 06:12, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't the freak weather record about August 4, 2008 have been on this article?[edit]

Based on so many of the YouTube videos of thunderstorms, a massive one hit Chicago on this particular day. I won't edit this article because due to my autism and the fact that I don't live in Chicago, it may not be reliable enough so this message is for reminder and suggestion purposes only. I have been frightened of thunderstorms though which resulted in such a discovery on YouTube. Autisexp235 (talk) 21:57, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Using Midway Data for Chicago climate?[edit]

O'Hare is the official recording site for Chicago weather data, and was for the entire period from 1981-2010, so it appears inappropriate to use the data from midway as examples of the records and averages for Chicago. Midway is no more representative than the lakefront is, or O'Hare for that matter, but O'Hare is the official site, and should be the source for stats of this sort. If there's no objection I'll change the data to the official records.Icebox93 (talk) 04:15, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Winter section[edit]

This section understates the winter stats, suggesting that 1 inch of snow is a possibility in winter, when this has never happened in years we have records, and is considerably balmier sounding than that the long-term averages suggest. If one is looking for info about the climate of Chicago, the long term averages are the best measure of this. I've rewritten the section to take account of these issues. Icebox93 (talk) 15:28, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Spring section citation[edit]

I added http://www.baseball-almanac.com/ as a citation for the snowed out White Sox opener in 1982. Not 100% sure that's an acceptable source though. --DaBunny42 (talk) 20:47, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Climate of Chicago. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140714122249/http://www.myfoxphilly.com/story/20650138/tuesday-mornings-sub-zero-temperatures-end-711-day-streak to http://www.myfoxphilly.com/story/20650138/tuesday-mornings-sub-zero-temperatures-end-711-day-streak

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:59, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Aurora weather box shows by default, should be O'Hare[edit]

There are three weather boxes (O'Hare, Midway, and Aurora), and by default the Aurora box is shown with O'Hare and Midway collapsed on my desktop Chrome browser. I think this is misleading and likely to lead to errors. I propose the O'Hare box be open by default, because that is the (current) official weather site. 38.124.33.230 (talk) 01:23, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]