Talk:Climax vegetation

hello im just wondering for my homework on my homework they asked me for number 10 it says what is the climax vegetation? and i dont know what that means at all........

what a lousy article —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.195.146.109 (talk) 03:31, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think this article needs to be more clear. It all seems like one huge definition to me. Also there are no visuals, I will try to add some in the next couple of days. Matt.Blanch (talk) 00:32, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

I think this article should be merged to Climax community, since it deals with the same subject, and the second is more elaborated and general. If there are not objections, I will proceed to do it.--Auró (talk) 06:41, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly I think that "climax" should primarily be approached from an historical perspective. But yes, we don't need two articles on the same topic. Especially one that's been outdated in its primary sense (Clementsian superorganism) for almost half a century. Guettarda (talk) 13:50, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What are we waiting for... doing the merge now. The case is clear. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:57, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Start a discussion about improving the Climax vegetation page

Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Climax vegetation" page.

Start a discussion