Talk:Clinical significance

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Statistics Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

In my opinion, either the article needed to be retitled something like "clinical significance (psychology term)" (actually not that, but it typifies the issue) or it at least needed to make reference to the currency / non-technical acceptability of the useful (and widely used) broader concept. Linguistic conflation such as "practical clinical significance" occurs in everyday speech, although I fully understand that it may irk technically precise people. Pushing general usage toward the strict use of a the triad of "statistical, practical and clinical significances" would I fear run up against WP:WEIGHT (by unduly emphasizing one definition.) Furthermore, in the spirit of friendy wikipedianism, hopefully the edits actually make the previous message of the page clearer, and also more capable of subsequent expansion / inclusion of other potential usage / applications of "the term." Please contact me if you have concerns.FeatherPluma (talk) 22:50, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No clinical significance of a measurement

This article seems to exclusively consider whether a proposed treatment is clinically signigicant, especially in mental issues. Now I have heard physicians call an abnormal lab result or EKG "not clinically significant". What do they mean by that? -- Solo Owl 02:25, 23 September 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eall Ân Ûle (talk • contribs)