Talk:Coalescence (chemistry)

Copyvio?

This article was tagged for speedy deletion under copyvio. My opinion is that the sentence in this article is not an "unambiguous copyright violation" of the sentence in the linked PDF document. Could a third opinion state whether this is, in fact, a copyright violation or not? The discussion can be found at User_talk:SatyrTN#Coalescence_.28chemistry.29. Thanks! -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 18:08, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Response to third opinion request:

I think it is.—Work permit (talk) 22:50, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

.

I fixed it--Work permit (talk) 22:51, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help. Wizard191 (talk) 18:42, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please confirm classification

The WikiProject classification for Coalescence (chemistry) is Start-class. However, the page has less than 100 words, so it might not meet the grading criteria. If it should be a stub, then please set |class=Stub on this talk page & reinstate the stub tag(s) on the article page. ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 12:37, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]